Etihad Airways Strategic Management Analysis

by Jason Shaw
2.9K views

Contents

  • Introduction
  • Etihad Airways: Brief Overview
  • Analysis of the environment and industry
  • Macro environment
  • Industry Environment
  • Market Environment
  • Analysis of the choices of Etihad Airways
  • Analysis and evaluation
  • Business Strategies
  • Corporate Level Strategy
  • Fitness of strategies
  • Company’s performance during the Recession
  • Alternative Strategies
  • Objective evidence of the company’s performance and strategic outcomes
  • Presentation
  • Strategic Outcomes and their causes
  • Strategic Success and long-term implication
  • Conclusion
  • References

Introduction

Strategic management involves development and implementation of the major strategic initiatives taken by a company’s management on behalf of the owners, on the basis of available resources and in-depth evaluation of the company’s external and internal environment where the company functions (Zaremba, 2003). In simple terms, strategic management is responsible for providing an overall direction to the firm by involving or taking into consideration the specific organizational objectives, plans and policies. In addition, strategic management also involves allocation of resources and implementation of plans (Usunier & Lee, 2001; Wood, 1999; Zakarevičius, 2002).

According to Wellman (1997), strategic management is an important function of business houses because this assists organizations to set long-term and detailed goals as well as analyse the internal and external environment where a firm operates (with tools and frameworks such as, PESTEL analysis and Porter’s Five Forces analysis). Furthermore, scholars have also identified that in order to ensure good corporate governance; a company needs to ensure efficient strategic management (Hamel & Prahalad, 1994).

Etihad Airways Strategic Management Analysis

This thesis intends to learn more about Etihad Airways’ strategic management after the Great Recession of 2007. According to reports, there have been few businesses who have spared the impact of the crisis, and aviation is one of the worst-affected industries. As a consequence, Ethihad’s selection to assess their strategic management strategy is justified. As a result, before moving on, the report provides a brief overview of the organization.         

Etihad Airways: Brief Overview

Etihad Airways is a United Arab Emirates-based airline company. The business is one of the United Arab Emirates’ flag carrier airlines. The business was founded in 2003, and development has been associated with the company since then. The corporation is based at the Abu Dhabi International Airport and has its headquarters in Khalifa City A, Abu Dhabi. The company operates with more than 1000 fleets per week and provides services to nearly 96 destinations around the world, including Middle East, Africa, Europe, Asia, Australia and the Americas. Apart from the core activity of providing passenger transportation services, the company is also active in fields of goods transportation and travel and tourism industry. Hamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and James Hogan serve as the Chairman and CEO to the firm, respectively (TTN, 2014).  In the year 2013, the company acquired 33.3% stake of Swiss carrier, Darwin Airline, which was rebranded as Etihad Regional from March 2014. The company had earned staggering revenue of US$ 6.1 billion in the financial year 2012-2013 (TTN, 2014).

Analysis of the Environment and Industry

Two types of environment that influences performance of an organization are industry or competitive environment. The industry level analysis is best described through Porter’s five forces and the PESTLE framework is used for analysing the macro environment of a firm (Bouwman, Vos, & Haaker, 2008).

Macro Environment

Political: The political environment in the U.A.E. is quite stable and can foster development of the Etihad Airways. The government has undertaken policies to expand major airlines, which has been evident in the billion dollar investment of the government to meet growing demands of the Etihad Airways. Since 2007, the governments in other countries are restraining the capacity of airlines; but, U.A.E. has been promoting airline networks to facilitate growth (Boxall & Purcell, 2008).   

Economic: The economic growth of the country is mainly driven by performance of the oil sector. The global economic downturn had slowed growth rates of the economy; but, presently, the recovery is on track. The Etihad Airways have continued to show robust performance in profitability and the company had reported 24.5% growth in passengers’ revenue, which was higher than the industry average (ADEV, 2012).

Social: The overall population of the country is rising, which represents improved opportunity for the entire business community. The overall standard of living in the society is high, involving frequent air travel.

Technological: The Abu Dhabi government is strongly committed towards creating a knowledge based economy for achieving long-term goals of sustainability of the country. The country has been consistently trying to emphasise on human capital development. Other key areas of importance include growth of the private sector, research and development and improvement of overall infrastructure of the country (ADEV, 2012).

Legal: The legal policies of the country had come under attack ever since the global financial crisis due to rising number of lawsuits scandals. In order to control this damage, the government has come up with a new provision in the Corporate Governance Law in 2010; this aimed to restore trust of investors and public (Kampfner, 2010).

Environmental: The ecological footprint of the country is very high, which is making the government take proactive measures for improving environmental standards regarding energy, waste and water. This can have notable impact on the airline companies in terms of lowering carbon footprint.

Industry Environment

 The industry environment is analysed through the Porter’s five forces:

Threat of Rivalry: In terms of market share, biggest rivals of the company include Emirates Airlines, Fly Dubai and Air Arabia. As these companies are increasing their fleets consistently, competition is becoming fiercer (IATA, 2011).

Threat of New Substitutes: At present, Jet Airways and Oman air are acting as a threat for the company. There has been a tendency among the large companies in the airline industry to reduce their fares ever since the global financial recession. The fall in the disposable income of commoners have made them opt for low cost airlines (India Today, 2013).  

Threat from New Entrants: With relatively higher economic growth of the Gulf countries and those in Asia (particularly, India and China), threat of new entrants is quite high for the airline industry. The threat of new entrants remains high, despite low profitability of the airline business. New entry mainly occurs when existing airlines enter in new markets and barriers to entry are low for this industry (IATA, 2011).

Threat of Consumers: Initially, this threat was low; however, with rising prominence of online ticket purchase, this power has strengthened as customers can compare prices of the tickets, prior to making the purchase. Loyalty among customers is low and they are price-sensitive.

Threat from Suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers is high due to their control over the critical inputs. Over few years, there has been a rise in cost of fuels and a fall in that of distribution. Boeing and Airbus are the two suppliers in this regard (GAO, 2001).

Market Environment

Market Segments: Aviation industry generally follows customer segmentation process to divide customers as business and leisure passengers. Market segmentation is extremely important for the aviation industry for recovering the costs of their operation (Airberlin, 2012). Etihad Airways not only has low cost flights aimed for the mass market, but also segments its upper-end market as Pearl Business Class and Diamond First Class. The company provides staff-provision and multi-cuisine arrangement on board in order to attain competitive advantage over rivals.

Strategic Groups: The rationale behind forming strategic partnerships for companies is that they work with the pursuit of achieving a common mutually beneficial goal (Hitt, Black & Poretr, 2005). The company has formed strategic partnerships with Airberlin in 2012. This was done to improve the reach of the company in new markets as well as form a global network of connected routes. Both of these airlines have merged their resources and expertise so as to strengthen their positions. The partnership of the company with the Air France-KLM Group was also formed to enhance performance in the highly competitive industry.

Analysis of the Choices of Etihad Airways

From the existing analysis of the macro-environment, industry and the market factors, it can be concluded that the company has been quite successful in the decisions it has taken. This is prominent from the robust financial performance of the company and its increasing strategic alliances with other Airline companies for entering new markets. The financial report 2012 stated that revenue of the company had risen by 17% from that of the previous year. The company has also been trying to lower its carbon emission and has already reduced 24% of the emissions per kilometre, since 2006 (Etihad Airways, 2014). This implies that the organization is keeping up with the stringent environmental policies of the government and will become sustainable in the long run. Finally, the company has been trying to improve its technological aspect through development of the IT department.

Analysis and Evaluation

Business Strategies

Business level strategies refer to the way in which a business positions itself in the market in order to achieve competitive advantage over its rivals (Pinnington, n.d.). It also includes the positioning strategies, which are specific to various industries like, cost leadership, product differentiation and niche segmenting of the market (Hill, Jones & Schilling, 2014). Etihad has used the target marketing strategy as one of the primary strategies. The company has a wide range of product offering for the customers that ranges from top class benefits of first-class travel to comfortable economic class travel. The company has closely studied the profile and needs of the customers to understand the kind of services that are expected from them and has developed its products accordingly. The company also offers chauffer service not only in Abu Dhabi, but in all regions in which it operates; this provides the airlines with a competitive edge. The winning of three awards at  Skytrax awards for Airline excellence in 2013  like, Best Catering (First Class), Best First Class (fourth consecutive year) and Best First Class Seats, bears testimony to its competitive advantage (TTN, 2014).  

Corporate Level Strategy

Formulating the corporate level strategy can involve three main management decisions by the managers, namely type of the industry and business of focus, creation of value in the activities of operation and way in which the firm should enter, consolidate and exit from the industry (Hill & Jones, 2012). The corporate strategy of Etihad can be described as a vertical complementary business alliance. In this type of an alliance, firms share their capabilities and financial resources in a complementary way in order to improve competitive advantage of both the organizations. The recent investment made by the company in Airberlin and Air France-KLM Group reveals the desire of the company to penetrate new geographies successfully. The company has recently increased its Codeshare partners to include the national carrier of Serbia and has already announced to enter into partnerships with Air Canada and South African Airways (Airberlin, 2012).

Fitness of Strategies

The following chart presents the strategic management model that a firm needs to consider for its strategic planning.

Figure 1: Strategic Management Model

Etihad Airways Strategic Management Analysis

(Source: Armstrong, 2011)

The internal environment of the business represents factors that can be controlled by the business and external factors represent the circumstances that are beyond the control of the business (M. Trehan & R. Trehan, 2007). In simple language, external environment refers to the general and competitive environment faced in the industry; whereas, the internal environment relates to tactics applied by the business to overcome these difficulties. The external environment presents the challenge of competitiveness for the organization and it faces very tough competition from the Emirates Airlines. In order to emerge as one of the strongest Airlines globally, the organization is now aggressively forming strategic alliances with a number of other airlines for dominating the world market. The company has introduced notable changes since 2008 so as to restructure its corporate governance, thereby being able to effectively compete in the world markets. Few of the tactics that has been implemented are setting up of the architecture review and design board and improvement in the service management. The strategies taken by the company has been quite successful in raising profitability of the business and enhancing competitiveness. The company has been trying constantly to improve its quality of service along with the aviation fleet. This implies that pollution generated by the airlines will reduce progressively over the years and this will add to profitability.      

Company’s Performance During the Recession

Since the year 2007, the company has continued to experience growth. Reports have suggested that for consecutive 5-6 years, Etihad has managed to upkeep 8-10% profit per year (TTN, 2014). The overall turnover has also increased when compared with the previous year’s turnover. The number of passengers that have been catered to has also increased significantly. Likewise, the number of carriers and employees kept rising from 2007 (Pang, 2009). Hence, it is obvious that the impact of recession was comparatively low for this company. This also suggests that the strategies adopted by the firm in this part were appropriate and have been implemented and managed in an effective manner.

Numerous reports have indicated that the company has been successful enough to forecast the market situation and had devised strategies accordingly. This allowed them to mitigate the risks of the market and function efficiently. The major emphasis of the company was on market research activities and industry analysis.

Alternative Strategies

This section intends to discuss about policies that had been taken by Etihad Airways to consolidate its position. One of the repercussions of the alliance with Air Berlin is that it can drag Etihad into its own financial crisis (European Parliament, 2009). Moreover, the percentage of stake of Etihad in Air Berlin does not provide the company with controlling share of the latter. An alternative strategy in this regard would have been to acquire the controlling share in Air Berlin as the partnership is more beneficial to the latter. Since the global financial crisis, economies of the western countries, including U.S.A and Europe, had been severely impacted. The countries of the emerging countries, on the contrary, had been resilient to the crisis relatively. Therefore, the airline could have looked for an opportunity to enter into a strategic alliance with successful Indian and Chinese companies to capture markets of these emerging countries. According to recent reports, the company has entered into alliances with Jet Airways and even plans to enter China through alliance. The company has also largely overlooked investments in Middle Eastern airlines and has shown interest in airlines of the West (Menon, 2012).

Objective Evidence of the Company’s Performance and Strategic Outcomes

Presentation

This section of the report focuses on performance indicators of Etihad Airways, which have been crucial for success of the company. The time period of 2007-2009 represents one of the worst financial times in world economy as this was marked by failure of a large number of multinationals and even certain airline companies had found it difficult to sustain the pressure (Sezgin & Kozak, 2012). Some were nationalized and others were unable to cope with the situation (Kaplan, & Norton, 2001). Under such difficult times, performance of Etihad Airways was quite robust, which can be strongly attributed to strategic planning of the company. The key evidences of strong performance are (Gazzer, 2014):

  • Most successful commercial airline in the history of aviation industry
  • Contributed 5.5 billion dollars to the GDP of Emirates in 2010
  • Made a profit of $42 million dollars
  • Provided 56 million new jobs in times of rising unemployment
Strategic Outcomes and Their Causes

Nortan & Kaplan (2001) had developed a strategic map for the business, which basically has the essence of a cause and effect model, thereby helping managers to relate the critical drivers of performance to the outcomes (Martin & Beaumont, 2003). The following figure depicts the way in which a company can improve value of its strategic outcomes by focusing on various aspects of the management process.

Figure 2: Strategy Map

Etihad Airways Strategic Management Analysis

(Source: Murby & Gould, 2005)

In the last few years, following the global financial crisis, Etihad Airways had carefully weighted its options to build its strength. The Airline has been marked with a proactive strategy to built interline and partnership agreements. The primary cause for this is the organization’s desire to become a dominant player in the aviation industry in U.A.E. The signing of the treaty with the Air Berlin reveals a strong will of the company to be ahead of its Emirate competitors. The commitment of the U.A.E. government to improve ecological footprint of the country may result in policies such as, carbon tax (prominent in the Western countries), in the future; this can create impact on profitability of Etihad. To avoid this unseen change, the company has already taken measures like, green engines and light carbon containers, to render the operations more sustainable (TTN, 2014).

Strategic Success and Long-term Implication    

The analysis until now has revealed that the company had been quite successful in ventures that had been undertaken till date. The innovative partnerships of the company with most significant airlines of the world have created a long-term sustainability for the company. These partnerships had provided the company with a higher resource base and geographical reach to compete with the rivals. The fuel optimisation and development of successful fuels will provide huge competitive advantage for the company in the forthcoming years. This is because sustainable business development is the only way to remain competitive in the long run (Murby & Gould, 2005). Throughout the period of study, from 2007 to 2013, the organization had made remarkable progress in its performance. The sustainability report published by the company shows that performance is likely to be strong in the coming years as well. The strategies adopted by the company reveals that instead of starting from scratch, the company has relied on existing airlines through one-to-one partnerships in order to pool resources. This has worked wonders for the company.

Conclusion

This assignment goes into considerable depth regarding Etihad Airways’ policies during the tumultuous economic time of the global financial crisis, which seriously crippled the global economy. To consider Etihad’s market growth, this assignment used different strategic management principles. Particularly through a tough economic period, the group was able to maintain solid growth by strategic partnerships with other airlines, cost savings through fuel hedging, reduced maintenance costs, and promoted sustainable development. Following these policies had culminated in substantial financial growth.

References
  • ADEV. (2012). The Abu Dhabi economic vision 2030. ADEV. Retrieved from http://www.adced.ae/PDF/EcoVisionReports/Mandate%20and%20Executive%20Summary.pdf  
  • Airberlin. (2012). Strategic partnership with Etihad Airways.  Retrieved from http://ir.airberlin.com/en/ir/Equity-Story/Strategic-partnership-with-Etihad-Airways.
  • Armstrong, M. (2011). Armstrong’s handbook of strategic human resource management. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Bouwman, H., Vos, H. D. & Haaker, T. (2008). Mobile service innovation and business models. Berlin: Springer.
  • Boxall, P. & Purcell, J. (2008). Strategy and Human Resource Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Etihad Airways. (2014). Our commitment to sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.etihad.com/en-in/about-us/our-commitment-to-sustainability/
  • European Parliament. (2009). The Impact of the EU Air Crisis on the transport sector. European Parliament.  Retrieved from http://biblio.central.ucv.ro/bib_web/bib_pdf/EU_books/0068.pdf
  • GAO. (2001). Aviation competition: restricting airline ticketing rules unlikely to help consumers: Report to congressional committees. Washington: Diane Publishing.
  • Gazzer, S. E. (2014). Etihad profit rises 48% as equity alliances pay off. Retrieved from http://www.thenational.ae/business/industry-insights/aviation/etihad-profit-rises-48-as-equity-alliances-pay-off
  • Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Hill, C. & Jones, G. (2012). Strategic Management: Theory: An Integrated Approach. Connecticut: Cengage Learning.
  • Hill, C., Jones, G. & Schilling, M. (2014). Strategic Management: Theory: An Integrated Approach. Connecticut: Cengage Learning.
  • Hitt, M. A., Black, J. S. & Poretr, L. W. (2005). Management. New Delhi: Pearson Education India.
  • IATA. (2011). Vision 2050. Iernational Air Transport Association. Retrieved from http://www.iata.org/pressroom/facts_figures/Documents/vision-2050.pdf
  • India Today. (2013). Jet Airways launches week-long sale of low-fare domestic tickets. Retrieved from http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jet-airways-launches-week-long-sale-of-low-fare-domestic-tickets/1/297853.html
  • Kampfner. J. (2010). Freedom for sale. New York: Basic Books.
  • Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-focused oganization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  • Martin, G. & Beaumont, P. (2003). Branding and People Management: What’s in a Name? : London: CIPD Publishing.
  • Menon, P. (2012). Analysis: Etihad Airways’ push into Europe carries risks. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/04/us-etihad-emirates-idUSTRE8030WJ20120104
  • Murby, L. & Gould, S. (2005). Effective Performance Management with the Balanced Scorecard. CIMA. Retrieved from http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/Tech_rept_Effective_Performance_Mgt_with_Balanced_Scd_July_2005.pdf
  • Pang, C. 2009. Etihad’s Justin Gosling. Retrieved from http://www.expressvoyage.ca/reportages.php?sequence_no=25325    
  • Pinnington, A. (n.d.). Strategic Management and IHRM. Sage. Retrieved from http://www.uk.sagepub.com/upm-data/36579_02_Harzing_Ch_01.pdf
  • Sezgin, E. & Kozak, R. (2012). Surviving in the airline business with a brand image; Perceptions of travel agency ticketing employees on Turkish Airlines. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(12). Retrieved from http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_12_Special_Issue_June_2012/28.pdf 12    
  • Trehan, M. & Trehan, R. (2007).Government and Business. New Delhi: FK Publications. 
  • TTN. (2014). Blooming year for Etihad Airways. Al Hilal Publishing & Marketing Group. Retrieved from http://www.ttnworldwide.com/GeneralNews.aspx?artid=14206
  • Usunier, J.-C., & Lee, J.A. (2001). Marketing Across Cultures. NY: Prentice Hall.
  • Wellman, B. (1997). Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance. Contemporary Studies in Sociology, 16.
  • Wood, J. (1999). Establishing Internal Communication Channels that Work. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21, 2. 
  • Zakarevičius, P. (2002). Vadyba: genezė, dabartis, tendencijos. Kaunas: VDU.
  • Zaremba, A.J. (2003). Organizational Communication. Canada: Thomson South-Western College Publishing.

Related Content